This site is the archive for the videos and posts created for the Sydney’s Speakers’ Corner website: speakerscorner.org.au
“Everyone must have two pockets, with a note in each pocket, so that he or she can reach into the one or the other, depending on the need. When feeling lowly and depressed, discouraged or disconsolate, one should reach into the right pocket, and, there, find the words: ‘For my sake was the world created.’ But when feeling high and mighty one should reach into the left pocket, and find the words: ‘I am but dust and ashes.“
Rabbi Simcha Bunim
1. It was a quiet day for two reasons: (1) Steve Maxwell wasn’t there (because he was feeling poorly) and (2) There were fewer people around, possibly due to the May Day march nearby and its concomitant traffic problems.
It was a poor day to stay away, because Mr B presented to his grasshoppers a sneak preview of the federal budget, which will be officially revealed this Tuesday night by Australia’s Federal Treasurer, Scott Morrison. How Mr B obtained a copy isn’t clear.
It presents good news! Mr B went through the document, line by line, revealing Scott Morrison’s unorthodox but brilliant economic policy. On Tuesday night every person glued to their television set will be pleasantly surprised and impressed by Mr Morrison’s innovative measures. The treasurer will be providing us all with a $247b turnaround to Australia’s ailing fiscal position! As a result of this budget the deficit will be wiped clean and a big chunk of Australia’s debt will vanish. At this rate, in a little over four years Australia will have no debt. Well done, Scott Morrison! Your budget is bold and brilliant. It will be talked about for years.
Tuesday May 9th will be remembered as the day Australia took a stand and turned its future around!
The presentation would have been even better had Mr B provided a pie chart similar in style to the one below.
2. For the first time in this blog’s twenty year history this scribe made a mistake. Last week we told you that Cyclone Rhonda had returned to Melbourne. We were wrong. She stayed in Sydney for today’s May Day, and when those festivities concluded she came to The Domain to haunt us again. We were treated to a colourful history of the Eureka flag.
She also suggested that we should become a republic. But who would want to offend the harmless dear little old lady pictured below?
3. John August, radio shock jock of Sydney’s FM radio station, Radio Skid Row, also stood on the Ladder of Knowledge. He spoke about the ‘fractionalisation’ of parties today. For example, one party’s mission might be to help the environment, but there are so many different ways of helping it that the party could attract some environmentalists and repel others. It’s difficult to find a party that truly represents our values and policies.
Mark The Grinner explained why small parties like One Nation don’t have to be elected to make an impact.
Helmut couldn’t speak. Tony wouldn’t let him! (Tony, ex-speaker turned heckler, is so adept at baiting Helmut that Helmut now gives up trying to speak.) Hopefully, when Steve Maxwell returns, Steve can act as a decoy again.
Be kind, Tony!
4. Two poems were read. Mr B admitted to not understanding either of them. And one of them was his! Fortunately, Mark The Grinner was on hand to explain one of the poems to him. It is as follows:
5. The ‘Something Nice’ segment. To charm some and irritate others.
6. Other subjects talked about:
– How can it be that Coles was successfully sued for $1.1m by a woman who broke her hip falling off a safety step?
– The generation that has just died (those born in the 1920s) experienced a far greater rate of change in their life than those preceding them and those of us who are following them. They lived in changing times.
– The ‘Keyser Soze’ method of preventing all international wars.
– The upgraded NATO of preventing all international wars.
7. Mirko turned up at 4pm instead of 2pm. He is still adjusting to the changes involved with Daylight Saving Time.
8. Last week’s lament for more Facebook subscribers prompted a deluge of subscribers. (If you can call two a deluge.)
Our Archive site has been nominated by this scribe for the ‘World’s Best Blog With No Visitors‘ award. Wish us luck.
‘God’s a kid with an ant-farm. He isn’t planning anything.’
From the film, ‘Constantine’.
1. Apologies to our loyal subscribers for the old news that was electronically sent to you earlier.
2. The meeting had barely begun when Mr B disgraced himself by placing no value on children. He called them ‘walking natural disasters’ because they’re contributing to Earth’s population problem. They’ll be the ones using up seventy years of resources and producing more children, he raged. He added that an adult’s life is more valuable anyway: they’ve put so much into themselves.
One grasshopper added to that, pointing out that in some Aboriginal societies, the elders are more valued than children because of all the knowledge they have. When they die, the knowledge dies.
“When an old person dies, a library is lost.”
Two young ashen-faced lasses protested, saying that young children have potential.
“Yes, they do,” bellowed the cruel Mr B. “The potential to thieve, consume resources, pollute, and bring into being even more walking natural disasters.”
He then went off the deep end by saying that China hadn’t gone far enough: “What we need is a ‘no child policy’.”
That’s about when three people left. It was not a pretty sight.
3. As usual, we had members of the audience taking turns to replace Mr Bashful on the Ladder of Knowledge. First was Mirko, who phonetically said that if one factory begins making a product, no other factory should compete with it by making the same product. It should leave the original factory alone so that it can keep employing its workers. Why should one factory send another factory bankrupt?
It appears Mirko has expertise in science AND in economics.
And, he wishes to make it clear that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Next was Cyclone Rhonda, who demanded that Australia become a republic. She was adept at taking questions from the audience, and even more adept at not answering them.
Rhonda is on her way back to Melbourne. Thanks for visiting, Rhonda. You’re welcome any time.
Albert spoke of how innocent people can be persuaded to become soldiers and be sent to other countries to kill people they don’t know. He spoke about paid assassins and about North Korea’s Kim Jong-Un. And he praised China for the way it modernised itself into such a wonderful society. (Albert got plenty of flak for that!)
Helmut spoke about black holes and fielded questions about event horizons. (Speaking of which, it would be wonderful if a few of our hecklers were on an event horizon. Indeed, any horizon would do.)
Mark The Grinner gave what must have been a prepared talk about entitlement, and about characteristics common to the wealthy. The talk had structure. It had anecdotal examples. It had a point. It was excellent.
An example he gave: a study found that people driving luxury cars were four times less likely to give way to a pedestrian than drivers of ordinary cars. (Presumably no pedestrians were run over in the name of science.) Further, in a study in which the participants were asked to play Monopoly, those who were given an initial advantage (an extra die and extra money) and won the game as a consequence, tended to forget that they were given an advantage at the beginning. They assumed they won with skill, and even gloated over their opponent. Message: people with privelge tend to inflate their own importance and look down on those less privileged.
It was an excellent talk that held everyone’s interest.
4. The ‘Something Nice’ segment. To charm some and irritate others.
This message is from the PostSecret website hosted by Frank Warren.
5. The roadworks on the Southface leading to Speakers’ Corner will be completed soon.
6. We had beaut poems read to us. Ben The Whisperer read one about a person approaching death. Ben, would you please send it in? Or bring a copy with you next Sunday?
Peter the Younger provided another clever John Clarke poem, and Helmut read an excellent poem that had Isaac Newton being proven wrong yet again! (Where does Helmut find them??)
And there was this poem:
7. Other subjects talked about:
– When it comes to voting on legislature, should each member of parliament be allowed to vote secretly? That way, they could vote for what they believed in, rather than having to toe the party line. What would be the advantages and disadvantages of that?
– A controversial subject: are there instances in which it is okay for an older person to have a sexual relationship with someone ‘under age’? The question was taken seriously and discussed with civility. Opinion was divided.
– The speaker claimed that we can’t trust the accuracy of records written more than a thousand years ago (such as the Quran and the Bible) so let’s focus on what is happening today. And, just because a custom is accepted by an entire society doesn’t make it an acceptable custom, then or now. So, let’s focus on today’s customs, and if necessary, change them.
8. A record was made today. For the first time ever, Mr Bashful didn’t call anyone a ‘blithering idiot’ or an ‘imbecile’. We don’t know why he refrained because the audience was rife with members of both categories, and he was given plenty of opportunity.
Here’s something from one of them:
9. In the last five weeks our Facebook page has attracted just two more subscribers. It’s hard to believe that we are struggling to attract subscribers given that Justin Bieber gets plenty on his page.
And our Archives site is like a cemetery. Posts are buried there, never to be seen again.
“The greatest horrors of our world, from the executions in Iran to the brutalities of the IRA, are committed by people who are totally sincere.”
1. Mr B’s propensity to give his grasshoppers 4 minutes to speak, and then answer questions, seems to have become a habit. Today’s extra speakers were the usual suspects: Albert, Jean, Mirko, Rhonda and Helmut.
Helmut was asked to speak about his days of being a professional wrestler in Sydney. He explained how he had wrestled as Helmut Rommel for more than three years, having 167 matches. How many did he win? There was no point in asking him, given that the winners were decided beforehand, he explained. No match did not have a pre-determined outcome. He told us what he was paid. He gave anecdotes. He was required to be a good guy, which he thought was stupid. After all, Germans were the bad guys in those days. (He is Austrian, it must be noted.)
Helmut also spoke of the bodybuilding world and its scandals, and that was interesting too.
2. The best work of the Higher School Certificate art students from NSW high schools (public and private) is being displayed in the NSW Art Gallery, directly opposite Speakers’ Corner. The speaker claimed that some of that art work is far better than much of the rubbish the gallery owns and displays.
There was hum of agreement, and Mr B was in danger of launching into his regular diatribe against the gallery. Thankfully he was distracted, and the audience were spared another dose.
3. It was asked, is this sign below racist? (The owner of a Melbourne milk bar stuck this sign to his window.)
For the sake of the argument we assumed that the ‘black’ kids of that age were indeed stealing. The following questions were asked:
(1) Could the ban simply be a financial move?
(2) What about the fact that the shopkeeper is only prohibiting 14 to 18 year olds? Older ‘blacks’ are welcome? Does that change our perspective?
(3) What if the shop owner didn’t include Sudanese kids, only Aboriginal kids? Or vice versa? (In other words, skin colour wasn’t an issue.)
(4) What if the shop owner was white, and he found that only white skinned youths of that age stole, and he prohibited only them? Would he be racist?
(5) What if the shop owner was Sudanese and he was only banning Sudanese teenagers of that age?
(6) What if the shopkeeper knew some of the black kids and trusted them, and made them exceptions?
(7) What if there is a gang of young white kids, aged from 14 to 18, and they all wear a blue bandana to show they’re in the gang. To stay in the gang they’re expected to steal, and they steal from the shopkeeper regularly. What if the white shopkeeper put up a sign that said: ‘Members of the blue bandana gang are prohibited’? Does that mean he has a prejudice against the colour blue? Does it mean he has a prejudice against bandanas? Or a prejudice against blue bandanas? Or does he have a prejudice against teenagers who choose to wear blue bandanas? Does he have a prejudice at all?
(8) For those of you who still think the sign is racist: let’s say the shopkeeper is obliged to pull down the sign and as a consequence loses $1,000 a year, every year, to theft. Would you be prepared to reimburse him?
Discussion was vibrant.
4. The Something Nice segment. To charm some and irritate others.
5. A few months ago Mr B explained why there is no such thing as a Scotsman (or Swede, Tongan, Aborigine, Jew etc.) He even made a video of the talk which has resoundingly been ignored. The video below expresses the same sentiment, but says it much better. Lift your game, Mr B.
6. Other topics discussed:
– Waterlogged homes in Wooloomooloo prompted a discussion about the merits of housing developers using their own inspectors to self regulate.
– Mr B railed against the idea that someone could be charged with ‘blasphemy’, and he expressed concern about the idea of people voting for a candidate simply because that candidate shared their faith. He would prefer that people vote for the person they think is best for the nation.
– Peter the Younger read another pleasing John Clarke poem, and then the group discussed Mary Gilmore’s poem, ‘The House’. Its reception was lukewarm at best, with Mark The Grinner being genuinely distressed.
– Bad statistics. To say that you’re nine times likely to be killed by a bee than a shark is a gross misrepresentation of the facts, Mr B claimed, indignant.
“The louder he talked of his honour, the faster we counted our spoons.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson.
1. Welcome back, Steve Maxwell! Steve told this scribe that today went well for him and he felt no pain.
His theme for today was “Australia: Who are we? Why are we here? Where are we going?”
After an afternoon of soul searching and debate with his grasshoppers, a consensus was reached. Their answers:
“We don’t know who we are, we don’t know why we are here, and we have no idea where we are going.”
That’s a good day’s work, Steve! See you next week.
2. Today was Easter Sunday. Tony arrived late, and it was suggested that it was because he had trouble finding the Easter eggs he had hidden for himself in his garden the night before.
This scribe has just received some photos from the Danish Delight, Pia. I will intersperse the posts with them.
Speaking of Easter Egg hunts:
3. Mr B urged us all to buy only free range chocolate eggs. Then in a more serious vein he compared Easter egg hunts with today’s western society. He pointed out that although older children find more chocolate eggs in the garden than younger children because they have the advantage of age, height, nimbleness & experience, at the end of the hunt the eggs are combined and shared equallly among all the children. However, in our society, those with the the advantages (born into wealth, with high intelligence, going to the right school . . .) aren’t so quick to share their ‘Easter eggs’ with those less fortunate (those forced to stay home to care for a loved one; the intellectually or physically disabled, the uneducated . . . ).
4. Today, on Easter Sunday, we all felt it appropriate to have a minute’s silence for J.C. And so we did.
Then Pete the Younger solemnly stood on the Ladder of Sensitivity and read two of his poems as a tribute. As usual, we enjoyed them.
John Clarke was certainly a talented and likeable man.
Our Danish visitor Pia recited an old favourite and got a good laugh for her effort.
Dave, an artist who brought along a whopping big painting featuring Christ on the cross, also read a poem. Both his painting and his poem gave every person who trivialised the real meaning of Easter a harsh metaphorical wallop. Both painting and poem were wonderful! Thanks, Dave!
Then Mr B had to let the side down with some doggerel:
Daisy the Beautiful
Oh daisy with thy flower of gold,
Thou art a thing of beauty to behold,
growing there in the dark, dark ground,
the ground where worms and slugs abound.
But when you flower in the bright, bright sun,
we know the slugs have lost and thou hast won.
5. If the poem below doesn’t make sense to you now, it might this coming Sunday when Mr B and his grasshoppers discuss it.
6. Mr B invited members of the audience to get up and speak. Cyclone Rhonda spoke about the need for Australia to become a republic and left all of us in her wake. A fantastic effort.
Norm had the crowd intrigued with his views on education. He received lots of questions. Good work, Norm!
Albert the Whisperer claimed that Jesus Christ was mortal and the resurrection was a put-up job. He agreed that Jesus Christ was effectively just a soapbox speaker.
(Does that mean that when the Second Coming finally occurs, the returning messiah will be a soapbox speaker? Should we be speaking to Steve Maxwell and Mr B with more respect?)
This scribe suspects that the ‘dead man’s fingers‘ fungus is the closest thing we’ll get to a person being resurrected.
7. We spoke about the man in the U.S. who was dragged off the plane and suffered injuries as a result. Mr B explained why the man was at fault, and that whatever injuries he received, he deserved them. (Mind you, the man will win millions in a law suit.)
8. Mr B nearly fell over when a grasshopper expressed interest in his assertiveness tips. (Everyone else thought she was a plant.)
Today’s tip? He told us to not try to be mindreaders. When there is something we don’t understand, let’s ask. Click here for more information.
9. The ‘Something Nice’ segment. To charm some and irritate others:
10. Mr B discussed a video of a Muslim woman explaining to another Muslim woman how an angry husband should hit his wife with a scarf. Mr B defended the woman, and said that the media were unconscionable in their self-righteous protest. By saying that she was condoning violence, and that it was outrageous that she did so, the media were simply trying to gain viewers.
He hoped the media would turn their focus back to the high rates of real domestic violence in anglo society.
11. We discussed a knotty problem about Australia’s intake of refugees. How many should we welcome? Were the people who were against the idea of welcoming more refugees lacking in compassion, as advocates suggested, or were there other factors? Should logistics be part of the decision? Is it a question of values?
Mr B claimed that 99.9% of Australia’s population were willing to take refugees, but differed in the number that they’d take. Further, he claimed that 99.9% of Australia’s population would baulk at taking every displaced person on the planet, which means that nearly everyone would at some point feel compelled to say, ‘That’s enough. No more refugees.’
The conclusion? We should talk more and be less self-righteous. And every overt advocate of refugees should be asked the simple question: “Of the 40 million refugees who would be willing to come to Australia, how many would you accept?” Because as soon as they attempt to answer the question, they have to face the fact that whatever number they give, it would mean they too would be rejecting refugees. (Unless they said, ‘All of them’, in which case, they should be locked in a closet.)
12. Other subjects discussed:
– ‘Why did the Vikings bury their soldiers with their swords?‘, Mr B wanted to know. After all, if they had dug the soldiers up a few years later they would have found that the sword had not been whisked away to Valhalla. (Nor had the soldier, for that matter.) That would have told them to not waste swords by burying them.
One grasshopper patiently explained to Mr B that it was the spirit of the sword that accompanied the soldier to Valhalla. (As though that made more sense.)
– Women should not be expected to love their bodies, said Mr B. They already have enough problems with their self-esteem without having to deal with their failure to heed that banal advice.
One grasshopper suggested that perhaps we should be encouraging women to stop hating their bodies.
13. Lost property. The speaker asked the crowd if anyone had lost a roll of $100 notes wrapped in a rubber band. They had found the rubber band.
14. A big ‘thank you’ to the kind grasshopper who handed Tony Boyce and Mr B an Easter Egg each after the meeting. Both the egg and the generosity were appreciated!
Thankfully, the eggs were made of chocolate, unlike this one:
14. Someone has left a comment at the end of last week’s post. Make of it what you will.
15. Everyone who visits our Facebook page before midnight tonight (Easter Sunday) will receive an extra chocolate egg from the Easter bunny on Monday morning.
“. . . the old idea that ‘Mother Nature’ knows best is a concept that could only have arisen in a comfortable, well-fed society which has forgotten what it is to struggle for existence. Nature is not motherly, she is red in tooth and claw, she ravens for food – and she has no favourites.”
1. Cyclone Rhonda is back, up from Melbourne! When she stood on the Ladder of Knowledge she wowed the audience with a string of opinions. She and Norm had a few words to say to each other, which only added to our amusement.
Later in the day she agreed to debate with Mr B the idea that Australia should become a republic, and she won the debate easily by not bothering to present her point of view. She used the opportunity to talk about 1970’s communism and Chiang Kai-shek. A brilliant manoeuvre that left Mr B looking silly.
Rhonda will be at Speakers’ Corner for another two weeks.
If you’d like to see Rhonda in action, click here to see a few video highlights.
2. Other grasshoppers were invited to speak too, and each was given five minutes plus question time. Kieran explained why he thought Donald Trump’s bombing of the Syrian airfield was a good idea. He spoke well and is obviously informed.
Mirko spoke about his phonetic language. He nodded sagely when the group, working together as a team, finally managed to decipher one of his printed phonetic messages. He felt vindicated.
Mark the Grinner spoke about perfectionism, and about the relationship between reality and our growing addiction to electronic devices. He also briefly mentioned selfies. He should know that it’s not just humans who take selfies:
3. Steve Maxwell almost made it to Speakers’ Corner today, but a minor setback in his recovery meant that we won’t see him for another week. No backflips or cartwheels for another month, Steve. Doctor’s orders.
4. Mr B admitted that he struggles to complete questionnaires, and to give an example he felt the need to describe the time he was in a spa with eight others and had an awkward experience.
Peter the Younger suggested that most questionnaires are designed to get the result they want anyway, so perhaps it’s not such a bad thing that Mr B struggles to complete them.
5. Today’s assertiveness tip was: ‘Get out of the habit of using filler words like ‘um’, ‘er’, ‘like’, ‘sort of’ and ‘you know’.
What does that bad habit have to do with assertiveness? Click here to find out.
To practise, a few grasshoppers took turns to play the ‘Half a minute’ game in which they had to talk for 30 seconds without using those filler words’. They made the task look easy.
6. Mr B told the tale about Ulysses sailing by the island of sirens. He said that like Ulysses, we also have to tie ourselves to a metaphorical mast when we are presented with temptations that can disable us.
If that doesn’t make sense see this chapter on his blog.
7. This week’s paradigm. (A paradigm is a pervasive belief held by most people in society, even though that belief might be weird to an objective and sensible observer.) The paradigm: “We are entitled to a high standard of living.”
People who have adopted that paradigm (most of us) have little interest in sacrificing comfort for change.
A few months ago South Australia experienced a number of power blackouts, prompting displays of indignation and blame. Yet not once did someone say, ‘Let’s accept the blackouts. Rather than spending hundreds of millions of dollars rectifying the problem and wasting resources, and increasing energy bills and pollution in the process, let’s simply shrug and get out the candles. Let’s put up with the inconvenience now and then.”
As expected, Mr B’s grasshoppers objected to the idea, and a discussion about the merits of coal mining and renewable energy sources ensued. That’s precisely what happens when a paradigm is prodded.
8. The something nice segment. To charm some and irritate others.
(A strange meme. A little girl with paper wings attached probably won’t fly. She’ll just plummet. But hey.)
9. Other subjects discussed:
– “I am better than no one, and no one is better than me.” Is that true? Or are some people better than others? Views were divided.
– The parable of the king and the artist. (That’s the story of how the king wanted a picture of peace in his palace.) The story went down well if you could consider stony silence as ‘going down well’.
– Land tax. It was proposed that every investment property is taxed not on the area of the land itself, but on the amount of floor space of a building. So, instead of having 20 apartments that are each charged one twentieth of the land tax for that block of land, each apartment would pay the full tax. That’s 20 times the revenue for the government (for that example), and it would prompt owners to let their properties instead of leaving them empty. It was a brilliant idea, spoilt only by two troublemakers who put forth sound objections.
– Do each and every one of us have a ‘pearl’ inside us, as we try to deal with a past irritant still within us?
10. The poems. Peter the Younger read one short, sharp poem, while Mr B supplied a longer one.
by Robert Service
‘Twas on the sacred First of May
I made a sentimental sally
To buy myself a slender spray
Of pearly lily of the valley;
And setting it beside my bed,
Dream back the smile of one now dead.
But when I asked how much a spray?
The figure seemed so astronomic
I rather fear that my dismay
Must have appeared a little comic.
The price, the shopgirl gravely said,
Alas! was fifteen francs a head.
However, I said: “Give me three,
And wrap them in a silver paper,
And I will take them home with me,
And light an ‘in memoriam’ taper,
To one whose smile so heaven bright,
Was wont to make my darkness light.”
Then lo! I saw beside me stand
A women shabby, old and grey,
Who pointed with a trembling hand
And shyly asked: “How much are they?”
But when I told her, sadly said:
“I’ll save my francs for milk and bread.”
“Yet I’ve a daughter just sixteen,
Long sick abed and oh so sad.
I thought – well, how they would have been
A gift, maybe, to make her glad . . .”
And then I saw her eyes caress
My blossoms with such wistfulness.
I gave them: sought my garret bare,
Knowing that she whom I had loved,
Although no blooms I bought her there,
Would have so tenderly approved . . .
And in the dark I lay awhile,
Seeing again her radiant smile.
11. Check out our Facebook page. It has exactly the same material, so why not?
God, grant me the senility to forget the people I don’t like, the good fortune to run into the ones I do, and the eyesight to tell the difference.
1. Mostly, the weather was pleasant enough. Though a big chunk of the meeting itself was not.
Mr B will be hiring a body guard from now on:
2. Steve Maxwell is recuperating well after his successful operation. Let’s hope we see him this coming Sunday. (And recognise him.)
3. The Domain Trust has finally installed a much needed ramp for the disabled. Thank you, Trust!
4. The ‘something nice’ segment. To charm some and irritate others.
5. We hope the crowds at Speakers’ Corner continue to grow. We’d like around 200 people, but on drizzly days we are lucky to get 10% of that figure.
6. Grasshopper numbers may be down next week due to the Palm Sunday march in support of refugees at 2pm. The hecklers are encouraged to go on that march. Nay, urged.
7. Mr B felt obliged to talk about ‘The Groom of the Stool‘, the man given the job of attending to a king’s bottom after the king has defecated. This practise began in the middle ages and ceased in 1901, when King Edward 7th took the throne (so to speak).
It was a well paid high status job. That’s because the groom’s close association with the king fostered trust. He was able to look the king in the eye (so to speak).
When asked if a form of toilet paper was used, Mr B admitted that he did not know. He was also negligent in not explaining the groom’s role when the king took a pee. This scribe wants to know if the groom had to hold it for him and aim. All of us wanted to know that.
We learned that there have been 41 Grooms of the Stool serving the last 17 kings, and that the female equivalent was called ‘The First Lady of the Bedchamber‘.
Why did Mr B inform us of all this? He claims he wanted to point out a paradigm that we ‘are in’. A paradigm is a collective belief held by a society that seems normal to those living in that society, but appears weird to those living in another country, or in another time. For example, decades ago most western people believed that women shouldn’t vote, work, or inherit property. Most people thought that view was right and sensible. That belief was a paradigm. We can look back and think ‘That’s weird. How could they have believed that?!‘ That’s because we are no longer influenced by that particular paradigm and can see the absurdity for what it is.
We have absurd paradigms of our own, says Mr B, but we can’t see them because we are ‘in them’.
We can look back and see clearly that for a human being to hire another human being to clean their backside for them demeans both parties, yet we think it’s morally okay for one human being to hire another human being to clean their abode for them. Mr B thinks the two practises are on the same continuum. He says that if we want our house cleaned we have a moral responsibility to do the job ourselves. (Exceptions exist.)
Of course, no one agreed with Mr B. But he would say we don’t agree with him because we are ‘in’ the paradigm that says the practise is okay. We can’t yet see the absurdity of our belief. He says that in 100 years people might look back at us and say, ‘How could they have believed that that was okay?‘
He forgets that we’ll be dead by then.
8. Other subjects discussed:
– The merit of the government’s move to lower the company tax rate, and the tax rate’s relationship with globalisation.
– This week there was no assertiveness tip. It was tactfully left alone. But poems were read on the Ladder of Sensitivity and all three were enjoyed by this scribe.
– Is it fair that taxi drivers, having invested hundreds of thousands of dollars buying a taxi licence, now have to compete with Uber drivers who have paid nothing to provide the same taxi service? And that due to this, the taxi drivers have had their taxi licences plummet in value? Which means that effectively, every shift they have worked may have been a financial loss. ‘Is that fair?’, it was asked.
– Mr B recommends changes to the high school curriculum. He said that instead of asking teachers to teach a language, history and geography, let’s pay them to teach basic but important life skills such as financial competence and how to cook a healthy meal; how to change a spark plug, a tap’s washer and a flat tyre; as well as emotional intelligence and assertiveness skills. He reckons we should be helping children prepare for a life of unclear and changing career opportunities, and that building emotional resilience and basic life competence in the kids would be a good start. Yes, all students should get those skills from their parents, he agreed, but the majority don’t, he added.
It would not be unreasonable to say that his suggestions were met with disagreement.
9. If you would like to be presented with advertisements while perusing these snippets, go to our Facebook page.
“The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.”
1. A recovering Steve Maxwell began Mr B’s meeting for him while Mr B farted about parking his car. Steve had a good crowd ready for Mr B when he finally arrived.
Throughout the day members of the audience were invited to get up onto The ladder of Knowledge and speak. Each was given precisely five minutes (with a warning at the four-minute mark). The participants were Peter the Younger, Mirko (heaven help us), Uncle Pete, Albert, Mark the Grinner and Helmut. Every one of them did a good job.
2. Steve is having another op this week. We all wish you well, Steve. Have a speedy recovery.
3. A speaker suggested that the prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, is a right royal wally for saying to journalist Neil Mitchell: “Does giving everybody a $276 a night in travelling expenses in Canberra pass the sniff test? Yes, I think clearly it does, assuming you think that’s the right amount. As long as the cost is the same across the board it’s a fair system.”
Malcolm was referring to government frontbencher Michael McCormack’s habit of staying overnight in his wife’s investment property when visiting Canberra, and claiming the $276 entitlement from the tax payer. (He received $48,000 over three years.) Malcolm thought that was fair and reasonable.
Two grasshoppers valiantly tried to justify McCormack’s entitlement claim, but even they ended up joining the audience in taking a dim view of it.
Why isn’t the media highlighting the lack of integrity displayed by McCormack and Turnbull? Why isn’t there outrage?
By the way, if you are a politician living in Canberra you still get an $87 entitlement a night, ninety days a year.
4. The usual suspects plus Helmut took turns to stand on The Ladder of Sensitivity to read a poem. (This scribe points out that they took turns so that our fervent reader does not mistakenly think all four men stood on the Ladder together and read a poem in unison. They didn’t. But maybe one day?)
Here is one of the poems:
5. Today’s assertiveness tip was ‘Don’t be a “Maybe”‘. When you say something like, “I might come back later” when you don’t have that intention, you undermine yourself. Both parties know it’s a lie, and you just look feeble and wishy-washy. For more information click here.
To make the point, Mr B gained Uncle Pete’s assistance in a role play set in a mens clothing store. But Mr B mistook Helmut for a mannequin, and things went downhill from there.
By the way, apparently you can buy a shirt at Target for $3.
6. The ‘Something nice’ segment, to charm some and irritate others.
7. The seven wonders of the world were briefly discussed.
8. To prove that success has no importance, Mr B claimed he hadn’t succeeded in life, but was still happy. But troublesome hecklers kept contradicting him, arguing that he was successful. They gave him compliments, and made statements similar to the one below. Poor Mr B.
9. There were two young women in the audience and Tony Boyce felt obliged to claim that they were wearing provocative clothing. Fortunately, the women had figured Tony out by then, and laughed off his observation.
I guess Boyce will be Boyce.
10. Other subjects discussed:
– Just how much does an omniscient god know? Could it know what it’s like to be a mortal human being?
– There are four arranged marriages for under-age girls in Australia every week. Should the Muslim community be singled out? Do the media unfairly focus on the Muslim community?
– The parable of the carrot, the egg and the ground coffee beans. (Mr B tells me he is enormously grateful for Uncle Pete’s insightful and pertinent interjections questioning each segment of Mr B’s story with the might of science. The interjections added an extra dimension to the parable.) This scribe agrees. Had Aesop had a man like Uncle Pete by his side helping him write his fables, Aesop would now be a household name.
– The story of Farmer Brown and his dog at the gates of heaven.
– The story of ‘The Last Leaf‘ by O Henry. (I guess you could say it was the story of O.) To justify his telling of the story, Mr B tacked on a homily at the end. Gracious of him.
– Are psychics psychic? (Hint: Nuh.)
11. Postscript: When Mr Bashful complained to this blog last week about the ‘stitch up’ done to him on the Cyberhate documentary, this scribe thought he was being paranoid. But the producers sent him an email and here is an excerpt: ” . . . the whole project was just a ruse to capture your one mistake to discredit you on national television.”
There! Mr B has his nemeses alright.
12. Our efforts to create a new social media platform, called BigChat, have stalled indefinitely, because we still can’t figure out what HTML is. So, keep going to our Facebook page.
“I don’t like violence. I’m allergic to it. I come out in cuts and bruises.’
1. This week we promoted Speakers’ Corner. It’s part of our five-year plan to make Speakers’ Corner Australia’s best and most famous tourist attraction. (The five-year plan expires next month.)
Helmut did his bit. At 4am Tuesday morning he got someone to clock him with the butt of a gun, and then he rang an ambulance. The media were soon broadcasting that ‘a well known speaker at Speakers’ Corner has been attacked with the butt of a gun’. Straight away, interest in Speakers’ Corner soared, with hits to this website going through the roof.
Well done, Helmut. Keep up the good work.
2. On the following night there was a glimpse of Speakers’ Corner on the ABC’s Cyberhate documentary, hosted by Tara Moss.
What was the result of that welcome publicity?
For a start, our Epiphany Specialist, Mr Bashful, has expressed dismay. He says that in his six years of being an infallible pillar of wisdom at Speakers’ Corner he has not once been wrong, except on just one occasion. And how is it, he wants to know, that on the day of that rare occasion cameras just happened to be rolling? And why, of all the hours of footage taken that day, and of all the hours in which he expressed his searing insights, did the film producers choose to include in their documentary just that one solitary blunder?
It’s a conspiracy, he claims. A stitch up. A coup. Obviously, the producers had planned this well in advance. They would have hired a think tank to examine his rock-solid arguments until a tiny flaw in his logic was found, and then employed the disarming Tara Moss to catch him out.
Why go to all this trouble to taint his reputation, he wants to know?
3. This scribe thinks that Mr B’s reputation wasn’t just tainted . . .
Apart from utterly destroying Mr Bashful’s reputation, the documentary was going to remind Sydney-ites that we’re still here. So, after the documentary concluded, did people rush to their computers to google “Speakers’ Corner Sydney?” Was this site inundated with hits? Did this site crash, unable to handle the cyber traffic?
Well, no. On Tuesday this site received plenty of hits from people googling Helmut, but on late Wednesday night and on Thursday, after the documentary had aired, we received fewer hits than usual! Oh dear.
Ah, but after seeing Helmut’s antics on the news, and after watching Tara’s documentary, did people make a mental note to visit Speakers’ Corner on Sunday? Did they flock to Speakers’ Corner today? Did the speakers arrive at 2pm to find a madding crowd waiting for them? Were the speakers hailed like rock stars?
Were the crowds bigger than usual?
No. They were smaller than usual.
4. How well did the book signing go? Not well. No one presented a book to have signed. (This suggests that the ‘5 book limit’ was unnecessary.)
Mr B was adamant that had this book been presented to him . . .
. . . he would have refused to sign it. When he first read it months ago he claimed it was one of the most enlightening and absorbing books he had read in a long time. He is reading it again, studiously searching for flaws in Tara’s logic. When he finds a flaw he will announce it at Speakers’ Corner.
Here is some advice for you, Mr B: know when you’re beaten.
5. In short, it would be fair to say that Speakers’ Corner is impervious to publicity.
6. Mirko got up onto the Ladder of Knowledge for five minutes and talked about Mother Nature’s role in the end of the Universe. Thanks, Mirko!
7. Two anti-vaxinators, Leigh and Renata, bravely took turns to stand on the Ladder of Knowledge and present their point of view. They spoke clearly and robustly without umming and aaahing, and coped well with the ire and the flak they received from the hecklers. They did a good job!
They would probably be critical of the man below:
8. The ‘Something Nice’ segment, to charm some and irritate others.
9. Poems from Peter the Younger, Uncle Pete and Mr B. Even Nobel Prize winner (cough, snigger) Bob Dylan got a mention when this excerpt from his song, ‘The Masters of War’ was recited:
I hope that you die
and your death’ll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I’ll watch while you’re lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I’ll stand over your grave
‘Til I’m sure that you’re dead.
10. Today’s assertiveness tip will be just as popular as last week’s, no doubt: Don’t use the term ‘Are you sure?’.
Bill: ‘Do you mind if I sit here?’
Jane: That’s fine.
Bill: ‘Are you sure?’
Bill: ‘Would you like a second helping?’
Jane: ‘No thank you.’
Bill: ‘Are you sure?’
In the first instance, Bill is afraid of being a burden to Jane. In the second, Bill is concerned Jane does not want to burden him. Either way, Bill has a ‘burden’ issue which will undermine him in other aspects of his life.
Although Bill’s intention is to appear polite and concerned, he appears weak. An assertive person would accept the person’s decision. When we immediately accept a person’s decision we give them respect. We assume their decisions mean something. Giving them that credit increases the connection we have with them.
For slightly more information click here.
11. Mr B told the story about Alice and the Dark Forest. Was that fear in the eyes of his grasshoppers when he came to the scary bits? Or were they just desperately trying to keep their eyes open?
12. Other topics discussed today:
– The merit of the implementation of The Richmond Report.
– The president of the ACTU, Sally McManus, suggested that it’s okay to break unjust laws. Is she right?
– The sexuality of transgender people.
– The two kinds of happiness.
– The source of anxiety.
– Mr Bashful’s ambivalent feelings about the homeless.
As usual, Helmut took The Ladder of Knowledge late in the day and kept the crowd entertained until it was time for us all to go home.
13. We now have an astonishing 48 subscribers on our Facebook page. Admittedly, that is 31,400 fewer than has Tara Moss.
There is to be a book signing this Sunday!
If you were watching the Cyberhate documentary on ABC2 television on Wednesday night you would have glimpsed some of our speakers. The documentary was hosted by Tara Moss and she did a good job of it. Her only flaw was to outsmart speaker Mr Bashful.
As a result of their reinvigorated fame, the speakers will be signing books this coming Sunday at Speakers’ Corner.
There are very few books they won’t sign. Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf and Philip Roth’s Portnoy’s Complaint are probably two exceptions.
There is a limit of five books per person.